Hydrate Control in Subsea Natural Gas Production
Ismaila Ibrahim
*
Union Energy, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
One of the most significant technological challenges that this industry faces today is securing the production flow in deep water exploration. Intense conditions of high pressure and low temperatures will favor the formation of the hydrates which could restrict or block the pathway to the extent that there can be a humungous financial loss.
This research was devoted to hydrate control in subsea natural gas production using results from water concentration estimation for reservoir, wellhead and onshore receiving terminal conditions. For illustration, a natural gas stream from the Niger Delta was selected where the transportation medium is a pipeline. Further implementation as part of the hydrate formation assessment input was done on the temperature and pressure profile along this pipeline.
A hydrate inhibition strategy based on monoethylene glycol (MEG) is under consideration. It is revealed that in the case if a temperature falls below 20°C and pressure will increase above 100 bar, then it would be met with a flow configuration in a region where hydrates are formed. Estimation of water concentration thus suffices to give useful information as possible prevention methods to hydrate formation while the gas flow is going on in the pipeline. The actual thermodynamic conditions required for the hydrate formation can also be deduced from the temperature and pressure data.
Keywords: Hydrate inhibition strategy, pressure profile, marine environments, hydrocarbons
How to Cite
Downloads
References
ETA Offshore Seminars: “The Technology of Offshore: “Drilling, Completion and Production”, PennWell Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma; 1976.
Jamaluddin AKM, Nighswander J, Joshi N. “A Systematic Approach in Deepwater Flow Assurance Fluid Characterization” SPE 71546; 2001.
Chapoy A. ’Phase Behaviour in Water/Hydrocarbon Mixtures Involved in Gas Production Systems. Présentée et soutenue publiquement par de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/49/99/65/PDF/These_Antonin_2.0.pdf (accessed 13th December, 2011). 2004;19-34.
Nava Z, Rojas M, Martinez N, Trujillo J, Rigual Y, Gonzalez C. “Hydraulic Evaluation of Transport Gas Pipeline on Offshore Production”, Paper presented at the Intl. Petr. Tech. Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. February, 2012. IPTC 15287; 2011.
Mehta A, Hudson J, Peters D. Risk of Pipeline Over-Pressurization during Hydrate Remediation by Electrical Heating. Chevron deepwater Pipeline & Riser Conference, Houston; 2001.
Estefen TP, Werneck DS, Amante DA, Jorge JPC, Trovoado LC. “Subsea Production System for Gas Field Offshore Brazil’’, International Student Offshore Design Competition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Department. 2005;28, 40-41.
Available:http://www.isodc.com/1st_ISODC05-ufrj%20team.pdf (accessed November, 2011).
Gbaruko BC. “Asphaltenes oil recovery and Down-hole Up grading in Nigerian Petroleum Industry” 228 ACS National meeting, Philadephia; 2004.
Akachidike K, Nayef A, Younes M. “Mitigating Hydrates in Subsea Oil Flowlines: Consider Production Flow Monitoring and Control” IPTC 17492; 2014.
Sloan ED, Koh CA, Sum AK, Ballard AL, Shoup GJ, Creek JL, McMullen N, Palermo T. “Hydrates: State of the Art Inside and Outside” JPT; 2009. Available:www.spe.org/jpt/print/archives/2009/12/19DAS.pdf (accessed 12 December, 2011).
Maina NS. Development of Petrochemicals from Natural Gas (Methane). Department of Chemical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria. Chem. Class Journal. 2005;2:25-31.
Vianna FLV, Orlande HRB, Dulikravich GS. “Estimation of the Temperature Field in Pipelines by Using the Kalman Filter”, Paper presented at 2nd International Congress of Serbian Society of Mechanics (IConSSM). Serbia. 2009;D-13:1-10.
Gudmundsson JS. ‘’Pressure Drop. Available:http://www.ipt.ntnu.no/~jsg/undervisning/naturgass/lysark/LysarkGudmundssonPressureDrop2011.pdf - (accessed January 18, 2012)