Exploring the Underlying Constraints to the Use of Geosynthetics for Civil Engineering Infrastructure: A Study from Ghana
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports,
Page 13-23
DOI:
10.9734/jerr/2022/v23i10749
Abstract
Whereas the level of use of geosynthetics on continental basis is generally considered to be low, little is known of country-specific studies that unravel the constraints to the use of geosynthetics for civil engineering infrastructure in the construction industry. Thus, this study seeks to identify the underlying constraints to the use of geosynthetics for civil engineering infrastructure in Ghana and determine the relative significance of each of the underlying constraints on the use of geosynthetics for civil engineering infrastructure in Ghana. A mixed methodology was employed. A structured questionnaire and structured interview helped in data collection. Data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, one sample t-test, and the Relative Significance Index (RSI). Nineteen (19) underlying constraints were identified as the constraints to the use of geosynthetics in Ghana. Each recorded a significant RSI value from 0.70 to 0.95 and t-test values were statistically significant. The lack of a geosynthetic research institute to champion research-driven campaigns for geosynthetics use in Ghana, and the use of geosynthetics is not prioritized in the manifestos of political parties in Ghana were unique constraints to this Ghana study only. In terms of civil and construction engineering practices, this study has offered an understanding of the constraints to the use of geosynthetics in Ghana and provided the theoretical basis for future geosynthetic-related studies.
Keywords:
- Civil engineering
- construction
- geosynthetics
- infrastructure
- and Ghana
How to Cite
References
Rawal A, Shah TH, Anand SC. Geotextiles in civil engineering. In Handbook of technical textiles. Woodhead Publishing. 2016;111-133.
GMA. Handbook of geosynthetics. Geosynthetics Material Association; 2002.
Oginni FA, Dada TT. Comparative study of continental involvement in using geosynthetics and implications for Africa and Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology. 2021;5(9):88-95.
The Constructor. The constructor. Retrieved from Types of geosynthetics in Construction; 2022, September 9.
Available:https://theconstructor.org/building/9-types-geosynthetics-construction/45274/
United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved September 2, 2022, from Envision2030: 17 goals to transform the world for persons with disabilities; 2022.
Available:www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/envision2030.html
ASTM. Annual Books of ASTM Standards, American Society Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Volume 4.08 (1), Soil and Rock, Volume 4. No. (8), Soil and Rock, Geosynthetics, Textiles. 1994;7(1).
Qamhia II, Tutumluer E. Evaluation of geosynthetics use in pavement foundation layers and their effects on design methods. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation; 2021.
Khan GA, Singh ES. Use of geosynthetic materials in road construction. IJSDR. 2020;5(8):1-9.
Agrawal BJ. Geotextile: It’s application to civil engineering–overview. National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering & Technology. 2011;1-6.
Adewumi AO. An assessment on the use of geosynthetic materials by construction industry stakeholders in Lagos State Nigeria. Federal University of Technology. Akure; 2018.
Ministry of Textile. Study on developing measures to promote the use of geosynthetics in India. Mumbai: Technology Mission on Technical Textile (TMTT); 2013.
Fulmer J. What in the world is infrastructure? PEI Infrastructure Investor. 2009(July/August); 30–32.
Raja J. Constraints and barriers to the application of geosynthetics. Creating sustainable cities and infrastructure using poly-meric construction products: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Geosynthetics Middle East. 2011;141-150.
Bayraktar OY. Use of geosynthetics in road construction. Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences. 2020;6(2):107-113.
GSI. Introduction to the geosynthetic certification institute’s geosynthetic designer certification program (GCI-GDCP). Geosynthetic Institute; 2015.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Geosynthetic Clay Liners Used in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Washington, DC: EPA, United States; 2001.
Zornberg JG. Recent examples of innovation in projects using geosynthetics. Proceedings of the 1 St Iberic Conference on Geosynthetics, Geosintec Iberia. 2013;1:37-50.
Tengan C, Kissi E, Asigri T, Eshun B. Challenges and strategies towards entrepreneurship education and learning among Ghanaian built environment students. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 2020;15(1):17-28.
Neuman WL. Social research methods qualitative and quantitative Approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson; 2006.
Aigbavboa CO. An Integrated beneficiary centered satisfaction model for publicly funded housing schemes in South Africa. University of Johanessburg. Johanessburg: University of Johanessburg; 2014.
Construction Review Online. CR Construction Review Online; 2020, December 4.
Available:https://constructionreviewonline.com/professional-associations/how-to-register-with-association-of-building-and-civil-engineering-contractors-of-ghana/#:~:text=The%20Association%20of%20Building%20and,1282companies%2C%20including%2015%20foreign%20contracto
Creswell J. Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. (A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie, Eds.) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. 2010;45-68.
Somiah M., Osei-Poku G, Aidoo I. Relative importance analysis of factors influencing unauthorized siting of residential buildings in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis of Ghana. Journal of building construction and planning Research. 2015;3(3).
Genc O. Identifying principal risk factors in Turkish construction sector according to their probability of occurrences: a relative importance index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) approach. International Journal of Construction Management. 2021;1-9.
-
Abstract View: 351 times
PDF Download: 95 times
