Main Article Content
The aim of this research was to determine the pressure drop along a 450 km long multiproduct pipeline. Empirical formulae and quantitative methods were applied in order to establish pressure drop as an operating parameter. Flow rates used were obtained from the daily operation records of two consecutive years and were in the range of 629 – 765 m3/hr. Using four methods, observed pressure drop results when pumping products through the pipeline were as follows: Shell-MIT was 954.5 – 1411.9 bar (gasoline), 1257.6 – 1860.3 bar (kerosene) and 1535.0 – 2270.5 bar (diesel); Benjamin Miller was 0.509 – 0.728 bar/km (gasoline), 0.693 – 0.988 bar/km (kerosene), 0.773 – 1.101 bar/km (diesel); T. R. Aude was 0.590 – 0.841 bar/km (gasoline), 0.814 – 1.161 bar/km (kerosene), 0.907 – 1.294 (diesel); Darcy was 0.578 – 0.857 bar/km (gasoline), 0.703 – 1.042 bar/km (kerosene), 0.858 – 1.272 bar/km (diesel). Simulations using pipe-flow wizard were carried out in order to authenticate the calculated parameters. Results confirmed that Shell-MIT method is only applicable to crude oil pipelines. From comparison of calculated pressure drop, Benjamin Miller’s method was most preferred as it observed the least value within the same flow rate range. Simulation results validated the calculated pressure drop and therefore, calculated Benjamin Miller’s and T. R. Aude’s values are recommended for use in further review study of the said pipeline.
Xiao Q, Li J, Sun J, Feng H, Jin S. Natural-gas pipeline leak location using variational mode decomposition analysis and cross-time–frequency spectrum. Measurement. 2018;124:163-172.
Ross DF. Distribution planning and control: Managing in the era of supply chain management. springer; 2015.
Madsen DA, Madsen DP. Engineering drawing and design. Nelson Education; 2016.
Stewart M. Surface production operations: Facility piping and pipeline systems. Gulf Professional Publishing. 2015;3.
Menon ES. Transmission pipeline calculations and simulations manual. Gulf Professional Publishing; 2014.
Westhoff MA. Using operating data at natural gas pipelines. In Proceedings: International Symposium on Transportation Recorders. Pipeline Materials and Property; 1999.
Larock BE, Jeppson RW, Watters GZ. Hydraulics of Pipeline Systems; 2000.
Barkech K. Studies in Systems, Decisions and control: Modelling and analysis of linear hyperbolic systems of balanced laws, Springer. 2015;15.
Levenspiel O. Fluid mechanics and its application: Tracer technology modelling the flow of fluids. Springer. 2012;96.
Schaschke C. Fluid mechanics: Worked examples for engineers. Institution of Chemical Engineers. UK. 1998;108.
Vincent-Genod J. Fundamentals of pipeline engineering; 1984.
McAllister EW. Pipeline rules of thumb handbook: A manual of quick, Accurate Solutions to Everyday Pipeline Engineering Problem. Burlington, Ma: Gulf professional Publ; 2009.
Coker AK. Ludwig's applied process design for chemical and petrochemical plants. gulf professional publishing; 2014.
Kennedy JL. Oil and gas pipeline fundamentals. Pennwell books; 1993.
Swamee PK, Jain AK. Explicit equations for pipe-flow problems. 1976;102(5): 657e664.
Haaland SE. Simple and explicit formulas for the friction factor in turbulent pipe flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1983; 105(1):89-90.
Escoe K. Piping and pipelines assessment guide. Elsevier. 2006;1.
Pipeflow. Pipe flow wizard software: Flow rate and pipe pressure drop calculator; 2019.
Akujobi-Emetuche GC, Joel OF, Chukwuma FO, Wami EN. Parameter assurance protocol and efficient pipeline design for accurate petroleum product delivery (Case study on system 2E/2EX, 0-56 kilometer segments). International Journal of Engineering Research and Management (IJERM). 2016;03(9).
Golberg MA, Cho HA. Introduction to regression analysis. WIT Press; 2004.
Matt Millbury PE, Ratzlaff J. Piping designer, LLC: Data Sheet, Pipe-CS, and ANSI Sch 40 (in). 2015;68.
Menon ES. Liquid pipeline hydraulics. CRC press; 2004.