Modelling Safety Behaviour from Safety Climate among Healthcare Workers in Benin City
Udegbe V. E. *
Centre of Occupational Health, Safety and Environment, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Amah V. E.
Centre of Occupational Health, Safety and Environment, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria and Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Ugwoha E.
Centre of Occupational Health, Safety and Environment, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria and Department of Civil Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
It is counter-intuitive that the healthcare industry, whose mission is the care of the sick, is itself a “high-hazard” industry for the workers it employs. Injuries at the workplace are related to unsafe work behaviour and unsafe work procedures. This research work concerns modelling safety behaviour from safety climate among healthcare workers in Benin city. The model incorporates safety climate constructs as independent variables and safety behaviour as the dependent variable. A questionnaire survey obtained 277 responses from multiple healthcare facilities in Benin City. A purposive/judgmental sampling approach was adopted to get respondents that fit the study. Multiple regression analysis was appropriate in building the model. 10 variables were originally collated but only 7 variables with factor loadings greater than 0.6 were retained after principal component analysis, and only 5 variables were statistically significant for the model development. The beta coefficients were used to study the impact of each construct on the safety behaviour of employees. As a result, safety climate constructs like management commitment, supervisory environment, workers’ involvement, personal appreciation of risk, and supportive environment, were substantially correlated with the safety behaviour of employees with 15.13, -10.309, 5.647, 1.649, -12.288 beta coefficients respectively. The overall R2 determination coefficient was 0.897 which depicts the model explains 89.7% of the variance in safety behaviour. This model has enormous potential to inspire healthcare management to facilitate safety behaviour and to successfully monitor the safety of healthcare sector workers. This research reveals that slips, trips, falls, needle prick injuries, cross-contamination, infections and diseases, mental stress, exposure to x-ray radiation, direct contact with contaminated specimen, musculoskeletal disorder as the most recurring accidents/near misses experienced as a result of unsafe behaviour of healthcare workers in their organizations. This research also reveals unsafe behaviours such as improper use of PPE, no use of PPE, taking shortcuts, verbal abuse, unsafe injection practice, working long hours, negligence and carelessness as some of the unsafe behaviours of healthcare workers in their organizations. Findings from this research reveals shortage of staff, fines and associated legal fees, retraining of new staff as some of the cost and consequences of unsafe work behaviour by healthcare workers to their organizations. Management should concentrate on more significant constructs to achieve the optimal and successful safety performance of healthcare workers.
Keywords: Healthcare workers, safety behaviour, safety climate
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Brown RL, Holmes H. The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1986;18(6):455–470.
Garavan TN, O’Brien F. An investigation into the relationship between safety climate and safety behaviours in Irish organisations. Irish Journal of Management. 2001;22(1):141.
Chen D, Tian H. Behavior based safety for accidents prevention and positive study in China construction project. Procedia Engineering. 2012;43:528–534.
Hermann JA, Ibarra GV, Hopkins BL. A safety program that integrated behavior-based safety and traditional safety methods and its effects on injury rates of manufacturing workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 2010;30(1):6–25.
Jitwasinkul B, Hadikusumo BHW, Memon AQ. A Bayesian Belief Network model of organizational factors for improving safe work behaviors in Thai construction industry. Safety Science. 2016;82:264–273.
Lee J, Lee YK. Can working hour reduction save workers? Labour Economics. 2016; 40:25–36.
Li F, Jiang L, Yao X Li Y. Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: The roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013;51:243–251.
Karanikas N, Melis DJ, Kourousis KI. The balance between safety and productivity and its relationship with human factors and safety awareness and communication in aircraft manufacturing. Safety and Health at Work. 2018;9(3):257–264.
Nivolianitou Z, Konstandinidou M, Michalis C. Statistical analysis of major accidents in petrochemical industry notified to the major accident reporting system (MARS. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2006;137(1):1–7.
Orji EO, Fasubaa OB, Onwudiegwu U, Dare FO, Ogunniyi SO. Occupational health hazards among health care workers in an obstetrics and gynaecology unit of a Nigerian teaching hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2002; 22(1):75–78.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Healthcare. https://www.osha.gov/healthcare. 2023.
Seo DC. An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety Science. 2005; 43(3):187–211.
Oliver A, Cheyne A, Tomas JM, Cox S. The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2002;75(4): 473–488.
Brown KA, Willis PG, Prussia GE. Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: Development and test of a sociotechnical model. Journal of Operations Management. 2000; 18(4): 445–465.
Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1966;1(2):245–276.
Thurstone LL. Multiple-factor analysis; a development and expansion of The Vectors of Mind. 1947.
Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91(4):946.
Saleem F, Malik MI. Safety Management and Safety Performance Nexus: Role of Safety Consciousness, Safety Climate, and Responsible Leadership. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13686. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013686
Pandit B, Albert A, Patil Y, Al-Bayati AJ. Fostering safety communication among construction workers: Role of safety climate and crew-level cohesion. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:71. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16010071.
Amponsah-Tawaih K, Adu MA. Work pressure and safety behaviors among health workers in ghana: the moderating role of management commitment to safety. Safety and Health at work. 2016;7(4):340-345.
Fang D, Chen Y, Wong L. Safety climate in construction industry: A case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2006; 132(6):573–584.
Teo AL, Fang DP. Measurement of health and safety climate in construction industry: Studies in Singapore and Hong Kong. Proceedings of CIB W099 International Conference on Global Unity for Health and Safety & Health in Construction. 2006;157–164.
Borgheipour H, Eskandari D, Barkhordari A, Mavaji M, Tehrani G.M. Predicting the relationship between safety climate and safety performance in cement industry. Work. 2020;66:109–117. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-203155.
Mohamed S. Safety climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2002; 128(5):375–384.
Davies F, Spencer R, Dooley K. Summary guide to safety climate tools-OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY REPORT1999/063. HMSO, Colegate, Norwich, UK; 2001.
Dedobbeleer N, Béland F. A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research. 1991;22(2):97–103.
Patel DA, Jha KN. Neural network model for the prediction of safe work behavior in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2015;141(1):4014066.
Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1980;65(1):96.
Glendon AI, Litherland DK. Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behaviour in road construction. Safety Science. 2001;39(3):157–188.
Afsar B, Maqsoom A, Shahjehan A, Afridi SA, Nawaz A, Fazliani H. Responsible leadership and employee’s proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020;27:297–312. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1806.
Tamene A, Habte A, Endale F, Gizachew A. A Qualitative study of factors influencing unsafe work behaviors among environmental service workers: perspectives of workers, and safety managers: the case of government hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Environmental Health Insights. 2022;16(1): Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302221109357