Friction Coefficients of Local Food Grains on Different Structural Surfaces

Main Article Content

N. R. Nwakuba
O. C. Chukwuezie
F. C. Uzoigwe
P. Chukwu


Knowledge of friction coefficient of agricultural commodities on various structural surfaces is imperative in the design and material selection for postharvest handling, transportation, processing and storage equipment. This paper presents the friction coefficients of local food grains on different structural surfaces as a function of moisture content. The experiment was conducted using a Complete Randomized Design (CRD) in a factorial treatment design to evaluate the influence of different structural surfaces (glass, mild steel, plastic, ply-board, and aluminium) and moisture content levels (6, 12, 18, and 24% wet basis) on the coefficient of friction of selected local grains (benniseed, finger millet, pearl millet, and hungry rice). Results obtained indicate that the friction coefficient (μ) of the studied grain samples increased linearly with increase in moisture level for all the tested structural surfaces. Within the range of the studied moisture content, benniseed exhibited the highest μ-value (0.526 ± 0.031 ≤ μ ≤ 0.784 ± 0.157) on ply-board, whereas hungry rice had the lowest value (0.248 ± 0.018 ≤ μ ≤ 0.527 ± 0.023) on glass material. Amongst the tested metal surfaces, aluminum had the lowest μ-value (0.236) at 6% moisture content. The effect of structural surfaces and moisture contents as well as their interactions on friction coefficient were statistically significant at P =.05 for all the studied grain samples. High values of correlation coefficient (R2) > 0.95 were obtained to indicate strong correlation between μ-values and experimental factors. A low coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.75% was obtained to show high experimental reliability.

Benniseed, millet, hungry rice, moisture content, friction coefficient, structural surface

Article Details

How to Cite
Nwakuba, N. R., Chukwuezie, O. C., Uzoigwe, F. C., & Chukwu, P. (2019). Friction Coefficients of Local Food Grains on Different Structural Surfaces. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 6(3), 1-9.
Short Research Article


Ganji M, Rajabipoor A, Alimardani R. Design and fabrication of a device for an estimation of the coefficient of friction of agricultural materials. J. Biosys. Eng. 2011;42(1):63-7.

El-Khier MK, Ishag KE, Yagoub AE. Chemical composition and oil characteristics of sesame seed cultivars grown in Sudan. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2008;4(6):761-66.

FAO. FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. Economic importance of pearl millet; 2005. Available:

Ganesan V, Muthukumarappan SA, Rosentrater KA. Flow properties of DDGS with varying soluble and moisture contents using jenike shear testing. Powder Tech. 2008;187(2):130-37. DOI:

Bhadra R, Muthukumarappan SA, Rosentrater KA. Flowability properties of commercial distillers dried gains with solubles (DDGS). Cereal Chem. 2009; 86(2):170-180. DOI:

Yanada H, Sekikawa Y. Modeling of dynamic behaviour of friction. Mechatronics. 2008;18(7):330-39.

Nyendu GC, Pflum S, Schumacher P, Bern CJ, Brumm TJ. Friction coefficients for dried distillers grains on eight structural surfaces. App. Eng Agric. 2014;30(4):673-78.

Bart-Plange A, Addo A, Aveyire J, Tutu E. Friction coefficient of maize, cowpea and groundnuts on different structural surfaces. J. Sci. Tech. 2007;27(1):142-49.

Coskuner Y, Karababa E. Some physical properties of flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum). J. Food Eng. 2007;78(3): 1067-73. DOI:

Nwakonobi TU, Onwualu AP. Effect of moisture content and types of structural surfaces on coefficient of friction of two Nigerian food grains: sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and millet (Pennisetumglaucum)". XI(Manuscript 1152). Agric. Eng. Int: the CIGR Ejournal.
Available: article/viewFile/1152/1246.

Pradhan RC, Naik SN, Bhatnagar N, Vijay VK. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Jatropha fruit. Ind. Crops and Products. 2009;29(2-3):341-47.

Kostaropoulos AE. Mandala J, Spiess WE, Saravacos GD. Factors influencing the friction of raisins during processing and handling. J. Food Eng. 1997;33 (3-4):385-93.

Bart-Plange A, Baryeh EA. The physical properties of category B cocoa beans. J Food Eng. 2003;60:219-27.

Baryeh EA. Physical properties of Bambara groundnuts. J. Food Eng. 2001; 47(4):321-26. DOI:

Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed., Washington DC, USA; 2005.

Darvishi H, Asi RA, Asghari A, Najafi G, Gazori HA. Mathematical modeling, moisture diffusion, energy consumption and efficiency of thin-layer drying of potato slices: J. Food Pro. Tech. 2013;4(3):215-29.

Ezzatollah AA, Hady MZ, Yousef AG. Determination of dynamic friction coefficient in common wheat varieties on different contact surface. Agric. Eng. Int: the CIGR Ejournal. 2017;3(2):110-119.

Ezeaku CA. Fracture characteristics of Bambara groundnut in compressive loading. Unpublished M.Eng thesis. Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Obetta SE, Onwualu AP. Effect of different surfaces and moisture content on angle of friction of food grains. J. Food Sci. Tech. 1999;36(1):58-60.

Sacilik K, Ozturk R, Keskin R. Some physical properties of hemp seed. Biosys. Eng. 2003;86(2):191-98.

Nwakuba NR, Chukwuezie OC, Asonye UG, Asoegwu SN. Energy analysis and optimization of thin layer drying conditions of okra. Arid Zone J. Eng. Tech Env. 2018; 14(SP.i4):135-54.